Chiropractic Adjustment – The Risks of Chiropractic Care

6 Comments
Join the Conversation
Chiropractic Treatment can Cause Serious Injury - Image from Mensatic, Morguefile Photo Archive
Chiropractic Treatment can Cause Serious Injury - Image from Mensatic, Morguefile Photo Archive
Although chiropractic doctors' offices are a common sight in many towns and cities, there are serious health risks associated with chiropractic adjustments.

Chiropractic care is a large field of alternative medical practices, in which a doctor makes adjustments to the spine and neck of patients; chiropractic adjustments are touted as helping migraines and boosting the immune system to improving overall health. However, certain types of spinal manipulation can cause many more problems than they solve, and they can also result in serious medical conditions, like strokes. Chiropractic adjustments should be approached with care.

What is Chiropractic Adjustment?

The spinal and neck manipulations done by chiropractic practitioners can take several forms, from adjustments made by hand to adjustments made using spring-loaded tools designed to force vertebra back into alignment. Many chiropractors combine these types of adjustments with traditional physical therapy to help the body heal from back pain and surgery.

Chiropractors offer patients dramatic relief from back pain, and treatment is often considered to be an ongoing process with health and healing as its goal.

Chiropractic Treatment – What are the Risks of Chiropractics?

Although chiropractic care is assumed to have many benefits and is often touted as being a totally safe alternative to traditional medical care, there are many risks associated with spinal manipulation according to Dr. Stephen Barret of Quackwatch. Health risks from chiropractics are more severe than many people are aware of, because under-reporting of health risks is common in the field, and related risks – such as strokes – may not occur for years after the initial treatment.

According to Edzard Ernst in the study Spinal Manipulation: Its Safety is Uncertain, less serious medical risks associated with chiropractic adjustments include increased back pain and mild headaches. These symptoms can occur immediately after adjustment and last for hours or days. Strenuous adjustments can cause damage; injuries can also include soft tissue damage, broken bones, bruising, dislocated joints and disk injury.

Chiropractics and Stroke

One of the most serious risks of chiropractic treatment is the possibility of a stroke, especially when the cervical spine – an area near the neck – is rotated by the chiropractor, according to Dr. Barret at Quackwatch. The vertebral artery is connected to the cervical vertebra and wraps around them when entering the skull; rotation of these bones can tear or block the blood vessel, leading to strokes.

Strokes caused by chiropractic adjustments are likelier to occur when chiropractors make neck adjustments by snapping the neck, although any adjustment of the cervical vertebra can result in a stroke, according to Dr. Barret. Symptoms of a stroke following chiropractic treatment can include a sudden headache, dizziness and nausea or vomiting. Strokes can be fatal, or cause debilitating and permanent damage to individuals who suffer them.

Studies of Chiropractic Treatment – What are the Benefits of Chiropractic?

Manipulation of the neck has the highest risk of chiropractic adjustment. However, are there still benefits to seeing a chiropractor? According to a 1996 Rand Corporation study, there is very little evidence that shows chiropractic care provides anything beyond short-term relief for back pain.

Quackwatch, a website that records and reports on health-related frauds and misconduct, as well as fallacies in the perception of medical care, has a summary of a number of medical reports and studies on chiropractics. According to the site and the studies, chiropractic adjustments are no more effective than traditional physical therapy.

The risks of chiropractic treatment far outweigh the benefits, according to the 1996 Rand Study; the low efficacy of spinal adjustments, and the risk of serious and sometimes fatal medical complications that can result from them should be taken into serious consideration when individuals think about visiting a chiropractor’s office.

Sources

Coulter I, et al. “The Appropriateness of Manipulation and Mobilization of the Cervical Spine” Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1996, pp. 18-43

Ernst, Edzar, "Spinal Manipulation: Its Safety is Uncertain," Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2002.

Homola, Samuel, " Chiropractic, Cervical Spine Manipulation, and Stroke," Center for Inquiry: Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, 2007.

Jones, Jennifer, "Neurologists Warn About Link Between Chiropractic, Stroke" Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2002.

Murphy, Donald. "Current Understanding of the Relationship Between Cervical Manipulation and Stroke," National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2010.

Norris, John. W., et al. "Update from the Canadian Stroke Consortium" Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2001.

Rothwell, Deanna M., et al "Chiropractic Manipulation and Stroke: A Population-Based Control Study," American Heart Association, 2001.

Quackwatch, Stephen Barrett. “ Chiropractic's Dirty Secret: Neck Manipulation and Strokes ” (accessed September 20, 2010)

Bailey Shoemaker Richards, Bailey Shoemaker Richards

Bailey Shoemaker Richards - Bailey is a writer from Ohio. She is pursuing a creative writing degree at Ohio University, where she is currently a senior. Bailey ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 7+9?

Comments

Sep 21, 2010 9:35 AM
Guest :
I think that the author of this article should have a more reliable resource for information than "Quackwatch" and Dr Barrett. Do some research into the latest studies on the ASSOCIATION of stokes with visits to chiropractors vs MD's and even the risk of hemorrhagic stroke CAUSED by NSAID's. There is no proven causal link between chiropractic adjustments and stroke because it is so rare that it is impossible to separate from random chance! Saying chiropractic CAUSES stroke is like saying eating eggs in the morning before being in a car accident causes car accidents. Do some REAL research, not sharing just sharing the opinion of a bias from an unreliable source!
Sep 21, 2010 1:07 PM
Bailey Shoemaker Richards :
Thanks so much for your comment. Informed debate and criticism are always welcome. I would invite you to read through the Rand study as well as Quackwatch and the gathered sources cited there, which come from medical journals, to get an idea of why I chose to use it. Additionally, I would suggest reading on the ~100% under-reporting of injury and stroke caused by chiropractics, which is largely due to the lack of a formal system for collecting these statistics, and look at the numbers of people who have died the day after adjustment or even on the adjustment table.
Sep 22, 2010 7:07 PM
Guest :
This is an excellent article. The reason most patients of chiropractors believe that their treatment has been successful is that they do not know that most ailments are self-limiting, which is to say, they will improve or clear up entirely even if you do absolutely nothing. The "cure" is falsely attributed to chiropractic treatments. The dangers of neck manipulation cannot be overstressed. If this manipulation is actually required for a disorder, any physiotherapist can perform it safely. It should never be done on a routine basis unless you want catastrophic results.
Sep 28, 2010 3:45 PM
Guest :
This article has no feet to stand on. Recent published studies report that the chance for a stroke event happening as a result of cervical dissection is extremely low. Much lower than a fatal pharmaceutical interaction that occurs daily. The use of Stephen Barrett as an expert is laughable. The man lost his license and every legal action he ever started. No lie. Do your due diligence research before you print the opinion of a true QUACK. The sources that you quoted are less than peer reviewed with the exception possibly of the CMA Journal which if it is run like the AMA in this country, is nothing but an organization that will do anything to protect it's "turf" by trying to limit financial competition. I cite "Wilkes vs AMA" from the 70s in which the AMA was found guilty of monopolistic actions and attempting to discredit the Chiropractic profession by any means it could.
Sep 28, 2010 5:26 PM
Bailey Shoemaker Richards :
Thank you for your comment.

I did my research very thoroughly on this topic. For example, Dr. Barrett is listed as being under active retirement without any disciplinary actions brought against him, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. Therefore you seem to have been misled on the state of his license. I would be interested in these "recent published studies" you mention.

Additionally, the ruling in Wilk v. AMA was about the AMA's monopolistic practices, and not the value of chiropractics as medical treatment. According to the ruling itself, "The plaintiffs clearly want more from the court. They want a judicial pronouncement that chiropractic is a valid, efficacious, even scientific health care service. I believe that the answer to that question can only be provided by a well designed, controlled, scientific study... No such study has ever been done. In the absence of such a study, the court is left to decide the issue on the basis of largely anecdotal evidence. I decline to pronounce chiropractic valid or invalid on anecdotal evidence."

The Wilk v. AMA case was decided in the late 1980s. A significant number of studies, including those I have cited, have been done since; they show that chiropractic care has risks, can cause strokes and is no more effective, when done properly, than traditional physical therapy. If you have evidence to the contrary, as I said, I would love to read it. Until then, please don't attack my research, which I assure you was conducted with integrity and a great deal of rigor.
Feb 15, 2011 1:34 PM
Guest :
I see you referenced: Murphy, Donald. "Current Understanding of the Relationship Between Cervical Manipulation and Stroke," National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2010.
Did you read this article and choose not to us any information from it?

Also @Guest: "The dangers of neck manipulation cannot be overstressed. If this manipulation is actually required for a disorder, any physiotherapist can perform it safely"
If neck manipulations are so dangerous, I don't see why a physiotherapist could perform them safely, when i chiropractor couldn't... reasons for the adjustments aside.
I personally don't agree with adjustments for maintenance or health purposes but that's another discussion.
6 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement